<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Seeing Glucose</title>
	<atom:link href="http://asweetlife.org/robert/blogs/type-1-blogs/seeing-glucose/2490/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://asweetlife.org/robert/blogs/type-1-blogs/seeing-glucose/2490/</link>
	<description>the source for the healthy diabetic</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:48:53 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Insulin pumps require a genetically engineered insulin &#124; A Sweet Life</title>
		<link>http://asweetlife.org/robert/blogs/type-1-blogs/seeing-glucose/2490/comment-page-1/#comment-228</link>
		<dc:creator>Insulin pumps require a genetically engineered insulin &#124; A Sweet Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asweetlife.org/?p=2490#comment-228</guid>
		<description>[...] Unlike glucose sensors which need quite a bit of work to take over any decision making (see my last post for details), pump technology is ready. Indeed many diabetics, both type 1 and type 2, now use an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Unlike glucose sensors which need quite a bit of work to take over any decision making (see my last post for details), pump technology is ready. Indeed many diabetics, both type 1 and type 2, now use an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://asweetlife.org/robert/blogs/type-1-blogs/seeing-glucose/2490/comment-page-1/#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asweetlife.org/?p=2490#comment-227</guid>
		<description>I agree. That is a really good way to use the sensor. However, if you wanted it to actually control your insulin pump without your imput trouble would ensue very quickly. That being said, I just got done talking with folks at the Barbara Davis Center and getting the sensor technology to talk to insulin pumps is top priority in the clinical division.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. That is a really good way to use the sensor. However, if you wanted it to actually control your insulin pump without your imput trouble would ensue very quickly. That being said, I just got done talking with folks at the Barbara Davis Center and getting the sensor technology to talk to insulin pumps is top priority in the clinical division.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catherine Price</title>
		<link>http://asweetlife.org/robert/blogs/type-1-blogs/seeing-glucose/2490/comment-page-1/#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator>Catherine Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asweetlife.org/?p=2490#comment-190</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s disheartening to know there are so many challenges, but I&#039;m grateful that there are so many &quot;exceedingly clever&quot; people working on the problem. I personally find my CGM to be a great comfort as I go about my normal activities -- it&#039;s surprisingly accurate compared to finger sticks (I&#039;m on Abbott&#039;s Freestyle Navigator, which I&#039;ve heard is the most accurate of the three available). And when I see a trend arrow heading dramatically in one direction, I take it as a cue to do an actual finger prick. In other words, my CGM gives me a sense of when things are going wrong, and I do a second test to figure out how bad the situation is in real time. It&#039;s not a perfect system, but I like  it a whole lot more than just relying on traditional finger sticks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s disheartening to know there are so many challenges, but I&#8217;m grateful that there are so many &#8220;exceedingly clever&#8221; people working on the problem. I personally find my CGM to be a great comfort as I go about my normal activities &#8212; it&#8217;s surprisingly accurate compared to finger sticks (I&#8217;m on Abbott&#8217;s Freestyle Navigator, which I&#8217;ve heard is the most accurate of the three available). And when I see a trend arrow heading dramatically in one direction, I take it as a cue to do an actual finger prick. In other words, my CGM gives me a sense of when things are going wrong, and I do a second test to figure out how bad the situation is in real time. It&#8217;s not a perfect system, but I like  it a whole lot more than just relying on traditional finger sticks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
