Dexcom 7: We’re done, we’ve split, don’t call me – at least not ’til you’re older

Email this to someoneTweet about this on TwitterShare on Facebook0Share on Google+0Pin on Pinterest0
Dexcom 7 receiver/display, transmitter and sensor

Dexcom 7 receiver/display, transmitter and sensor

My Dexcom 7 CGM and I have had nine days and nights together and we’ve parted ways. And, as if it knew I was not happy with it, it gave me one last kick in the teeth coughing up its last numbers.

I met a friend today for brunch in Manhattan. I walked from my apartment in Brooklyn over the Brooklyn bridge and then took a subway to the cute little Italian bistro  where we were meeting. The walk  took about 90 minutes.

After being seated and looking at the restaurant menu I took out my meter and tested. I was “80.” I took the CGM receiver out of my pocket. I was “80.” Unbelievable! This is the first time since CDE/Pump Trainer, Gary Scheiner, slapped the sensor pod on me last week in Philadelphia – and I carried it across state lines – that both showed the same number.

I know the CGM’s numbers are not expected to match up precisely with your meter numbers. I know the CGM tests interstitial fluid and not blood glucose and there’s a difference. I know there’s a lag time on the CGM of 15-20 minutes. I know you’re not supposed to make dosing decisions off the CGM. I know that meter readings vary up to 20%. I’ve also learned that means if you test on your meter and get 80 and you test immediately again, you might get 80 or you might get 68 or 92 or 104. I know all this, yet after its first week of so many misses, the CGM immediately won back my trust, and my hope, with that “80.”

Two hours later after a fairly low carb lunch my friend and I were strolling around and the CGM read “180.” Hmm…I thought, well I did have a few roasted potato pieces and a half a plain cookie the waiter brought along with the bill, maybe I need another half unit, so I took it. Then my friend and I spied a new concept yogurt store where you make your own frozen yogurt and toppings so of course we had to go in and see. And we had to put that tiny paper sample cup under the raspberry and peanut butter yogurt.

Now walking back to my friend’s car I reached into my pocket to see what number was on the CGM. It said “222.” Hmmm…well I had just had what was probably a quarter cup of frozen yogurt, guess I need another 1/2 unit, which I took.

Sitting on the subway platform 15 minutes later waiting for my train home a thought came barreling through my head…hmmm…”222″ … I’m hardly ever over 200. Let’s see what my meter says. My meter said, “108.” My meter also said, “What the hell are you doing dosing off your CGM!!! You know better than that!!!” Surely I do, but I had forgotten in the romantic glow of that “80” when the CGM won my heart back at lunch. I so wanted to be in love with my CGM just like the many people I’ve talked to are with theirs.

I pulled the CGM display out of my pocket and went to enter the “108” to calibrate it and it gave me an error reading. It actually said, “ERR” which is just how I felt, especially if you add a few exclamation marks, “ERR!!!.” When I got home a half hour later, I looked through the booklet and saw my sensor was done, and it had had the last laugh all the way to its untimely end.

A CGM? Not for me. Not until its accuracy is twice what it was for me. About 50% of the time it was tracking 10 – 20 points apart from my meter, the rest of the time it was anywhere from 20+ to 75 points away. It alarmed me telling me I was “53” when my meter said “85” and it fooled me into trusting it so many times.

I wanted to love you CGM, truly I did. But I’m going to wait til another generation or two comes along. Until a CGM is really ready to love me back. For now I’m sticking to finger sticks, and running for the juice!

Email this to someoneTweet about this on TwitterShare on Facebook0Share on Google+0Pin on Pinterest0

Comments (3)

  1. Sysy at

    This is how I feel about it, too.  In fact, I had a similar issue with the pump.  It was SO convenient to give insulin by just pushing a few buttons I found myself doing it when I thought I was high, instead of verifying I was.  Many people I know with pumps do this and it causes blood sugars to roller coaster.  It sometimes becomes a bit of a bad habit and next thing you know someone is fighting to break the habit-I know I did.  Eventually, I got off the pump to sort of simplify things again.  So now I rely on my meter and my syringes and have glucose tablets when needed.  We’re human and we like trusting devices made to help us.  For some people, these devices and their shortcomings prove to be a hassle.  Nothing wrong with that.  I do hope the accuracy issue is fixed soon, that will be a great day 🙂  Thanks for this post!

  2. jay cee at

    Despite relatively good discipline I have wildly fluctuating bs readings. This provoked a battle with my (then but no longer any) insurance company to get hold of a cgm. After research I ended up with the dexcom 7. We had some good time and bad times over the last 3 years but as long as it was used as a guide and not a definitive and absolute measurement of bs, it stood by me and helped avert many crashing and racing incidents.
    That was when it was working. Im now on my 3rd or 4th receiver  due to unexplained sudden rx death experiences and the inability of the system to continue working, for 1 reason or another, for any extended period. This is where the kicker comes in. the 1st rx died within a year and was replaced. no problem. the 2nd took a bit of a fight with dexcom as I was over 1 year past the “initial purchase” read the small print….(even though it died only a couple of months after receiving it). eventually I did get a 2nd replacement.
    Then that rx died. It was treated kindly, cared for, charged properly and generally never abused. then it died again. Dexcom fought long and hard and loved explaining that I should get a new replacement through my insurance company. heres my angle. I never got a full years service from the 7+ without some form of malfunction. this indicates reliability issues as my situation was / is far from unique. there’s plenty of bloggs discussing the same issues. So even if I did have insurance, I fail to understand why dexcom think I would apply for a new system. If your car constantly broke down, would you go and buy the same make and model when the warranty expired?
    Regardless, I was continually refused by all departments until I found a back door way to contact a senior vp. hey presto I got a replacement rx. thanks dexcom.
    Despite all the above whinging I love having a cgm. It is generally accurate enough to rely on, saves umpteen finger pricks a day and allows me to manage my type 1 much better than without. when the dexcom is behaving, it does a pretty good job.  BUT…
    Then the transmitter battery died (it cannot be replaced). I have been advised to buy a new system by dexcom.
    So, if any of you out there have a dexcom 7 (or 7+) they dont want / need / use and would like to sell or donate (either the little transmitter or the kit)…….
    A bit cheeky I realize but hey?? Im just trying to stay alive in a country that doesnt give it’s people health care.

  3. Dave at

    I have used the seven since it came out. The only issue I have is when I hit a capillary and bleed around the sensor. This happens a few times a year. I’m guessing the clot interferes with the sensor. Overall it is the best thing I’ve seen or used for diabetes.

Add a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

***The opinions and views expressed in this blog belong to the individual contributor and not to ASweetLife or its editors. All information contained on this blog is intended for informational purposes only. The information is not intended to be a replacement or substitute for consultation with a qualified medical professional or for professional medical advice related to diabetes or another medical condition. Please contact your physician or medical professional with any questions and concerns about your medical condition.